Gambling philosophy
Right now I’m in the middle of rereading BLOOD MERIDIAN by Cormac McCarthy, a book about scalp hunters on the border of Texas and Mexico. It’s an incredibly explicit and violent book, and near the middle there was a monologue that to me seemed to sum up perfectly the spirit of competition, particularly in poker.
from pg 249:
Suppose two men at cards with nothing to wager save their lives. Who has not heard such a tale? A turn of the card. The whole universe for such a player has labored clanking to this moment which will tell if he is to die at that man’s hand or that man at his. What more certain validation of a man’s worth could there be? This enhancement of the game to its ultimate state admits no argument concerning the notion of fate. The selection of one man over another is a preference absolute and irrevocable and it is a dull man indeed who could reckon so profound a decision without agency or significance either one. In such games as have for their stake the annihilation of the defeated the decisions are quite clear. This man holding this particular arrangement of cards in his hand is thereby removed from existence. This is the nature of war, whose stake is at once the game and the authority and the justification. Seen so, war is the truest form of divination. It is the testing of one’s will and the will of another within that larger will which because it binds them is therefore forced to select. War is the ultimate game because war is at a last a forcing of the unity of existence. War is god.
Heady, perhaps, for you wearing the I’M ALL IN tee shirt, but, well, you know.
Related Stories
POSTED IN: philosophy
0 opinions for Gambling philosophy
No one has left a comment yet. You know what this means, right? You could be first!
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: